<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listening to Wikileaks Julian Assange at the European Parliament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/</link>
	<description>LobbyPlanet - Portal on European lobbying and Brussels politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:35:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/?p=1117#comment-466</guid>
		<description>I wondered what Julian ( or Alistair or anybody interested in this issue really) thinks about the US Supreme Court Citizens United V. FEC decision of Jan 2010 ruling that corporations are entitled to spend unlimited funds in the US elections based on the US Constitution 1st Amendment. Does he think that for-profit corporations are entitled to the same freedom of speech than individuals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered what Julian ( or Alistair or anybody interested in this issue really) thinks about the US Supreme Court Citizens United V. FEC decision of Jan 2010 ruling that corporations are entitled to spend unlimited funds in the US elections based on the US Constitution 1st Amendment. Does he think that for-profit corporations are entitled to the same freedom of speech than individuals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: satanicus</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>satanicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/?p=1117#comment-458</guid>
		<description>ppl should use freenet so they dont get in problems 
http://freenetproject.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ppl should use freenet so they dont get in problems<br />
<a href="http://freenetproject.org/" rel="nofollow">http://freenetproject.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 05:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/?p=1117#comment-453</guid>
		<description>His main argument against freedom of speech was to protect reputations, which is pretty ridiculous. People don&#039;t have a right to reputations. 

What&#039;s a reputation based on anyway? Cultural relativity and personal opinion?  Mullis might think he has a good reputation but I sure as hell don&#039;t think so.

Does a nazi have a right to a good reputation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His main argument against freedom of speech was to protect reputations, which is pretty ridiculous. People don&#8217;t have a right to reputations. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s a reputation based on anyway? Cultural relativity and personal opinion?  Mullis might think he has a good reputation but I sure as hell don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Does a nazi have a right to a good reputation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nug</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>nug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/?p=1117#comment-452</guid>
		<description>the video of the debate between assange and mullis can be seen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGshmyKhcX4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the video of the debate between assange and mullis can be seen here:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGshmyKhcX4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGshmyKhcX4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Mowatt</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mowatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/?p=1117#comment-451</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s news today from Eastern Europe that Ukraine&#039;s government who&#039;ve  increased suppression of journalistic freedom now plan to apply registration laws to bloggers.

This is the country where 4 years ago we&#039;d published our &#039;Death Camps for Children&#039; article about childcare for the disabled which was later vindicated by a charity named Happy Child.

That article provoked a response which has continued into 4 years of defamation on a blogg hosted by Google and a blogger who has a UK barrister to defend his identity. She has made threats by telephone and has removed articles from the web which associate her. She forgot about Google cache however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s news today from Eastern Europe that Ukraine&#8217;s government who&#8217;ve  increased suppression of journalistic freedom now plan to apply registration laws to bloggers.</p>
<p>This is the country where 4 years ago we&#8217;d published our &#8216;Death Camps for Children&#8217; article about childcare for the disabled which was later vindicated by a charity named Happy Child.</p>
<p>That article provoked a response which has continued into 4 years of defamation on a blogg hosted by Google and a blogger who has a UK barrister to defend his identity. She has made threats by telephone and has removed articles from the web which associate her. She forgot about Google cache however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikileaks Video Release of Collateral Murder and Other Insights Into The Psychopathic M.I.C. &#171; Streams of consciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/listening-to-wikileaks-julian-assange-at-the-european-parliament/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikileaks Video Release of Collateral Murder and Other Insights Into The Psychopathic M.I.C. &#171; Streams of consciousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyplanet.eu/?p=1117#comment-450</guid>
		<description>[...] Planet Blog: Listening to Wikileaks Julian Assange at EU &#8220;Rarely does a lobbyist listen to someone and feel utterly impressed, no strings or cautious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Planet Blog: Listening to Wikileaks Julian Assange at EU &#8220;Rarely does a lobbyist listen to someone and feel utterly impressed, no strings or cautious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

